Jenkins Law Library
 
Research
Catalog (JAC)
Court Records & Briefs
Journal Portal
Legal Links
Member Online Services
Nonlegal Links
PA Legislative Histories
Self-Help Links

Services
Ask a Librarian
CLE Classes
Wed @ Jenkins
Conference Rooms
Books for Sale
Lawyers in Transition
Library Orientation
Order Documents
Research Requests

Membership
Benefits
Join Now!
Member Directory

About Us
Contact Us
Mission & Vision
Site Map
Support Your Library

Blog
Home / Research Tools & Catalog / Research Guides / Jenkins Blog /

Archive for the 'Business' Category
New York Times to Start Charging Soon? [UPDATED]

New York Magazine reports that the NY Times “appears close to announcing that the paper will begin charging for access to its website, according to people familiar with internal deliberations.” The decision wasn’t an easy one:

“After a year of sometimes fraught debate inside the paper, the choice for some time has been between a Wall Street Journal-type pay wall [Dan interjects: it's $100/year] and the metered system adopted by the Financial Times, in which readers can sample a certain number of free articles [Dan interrupts again: 10 articles/30 days] before being asked to subscribe.  The Times seems to have settled on the metered system.”

I’m saddened by this. As I said previously, I rely on The Christian Science Monitor, the NY Times, and Wall Street Journal (which I’d pay for even if Jenkins didn’t have a sub) for my serious news.” I can afford maybe one online newspaper subscription, but I can’t hack two.

Having said that, I totally understand why they have to start charging. If they don’t they’ll disappear eventually. Columnist Thomas Friedman sums it up well:

“My own feeling is, we have to do anything we can to raise money. At some point we gotta charge for our product … We’re in a megatransition. It hasn’t ever felt like anyone has the answer. My macro feeling is that I’m glad I had this job at this time. It was great working at the paper when it was on dead trees and could pay for itself.”

UPDATE, January 20: Here’s the announcement from the Times.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on January 19, 2010 - 11:02 am

The “Dumbest Idea”, 10 Years Later

The NY Times has a retrospective on the tenth anniversary of the failed AOL-Time Warner merger. According to the Times:

“The trail of despair in subsequent years included countless job losses, the decimation of retirement accounts, investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department, and countless executive upheavals. Today, the combined values of the companies, which have been separated, is about one-seventh of their worth on the day of the merger.”

A note about that last sentence. In the last 6 months, Aol’s valuation has dropped from $5 billion (July 2009) to $3.5 billion (November) to under $3 billion (December).

Anyway, the article’s worth reading; here are my favorite quotes:

  • Don Logan, former head of Time, Inc.: “Dumbest idea I had ever heard in my life.” (So much wisdom in only 9 words.)
  • Steve Case, co-founder of AOL: “For whatever reason, right or wrong, I had become kind of a magnet for a lot of anger and frustration, particularly with the Time Warner employees and also with shareholders and if we really were going to get the company on the right track and really capitalize on the promise of the merger, probably the best thing I could do was step aside and get out of the way.” (Translation: “The lynch mob was coming after me, so I decided to run like h-e-double-hockey-sticks.”)
  • Ted Turner: “The Time Warner-AOL merger should pass into history like the Vietnam War and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. It’s one of the biggest disasters that have occurred to our country.” (Can you tell that he was married to Jane Fonda for 10 years?)
  • Richard Parsons, former Chairman and CEO of Time Warner: “The business model sort of collapsed under us, and then finally this cultural matter. As I said, it was beyond certainly my abilities to figure out how to blend the old media and the new media culture. They were like different species, and in fact, they were species that were inherently at war.” (And still are.)

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on January 11, 2010 - 1:52 pm

An Eye For An Eye Makes Microsoft $290M Poorer

Yesterday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Microsoft must remove the custom XML code from its Office software suite by January 11, 2010 and pay Canadian firm i4i $290 million for infringing on its patents. You may recall that back in early September Microsoft asked the Fed Circuit to stay an injunction handed down in U.S. District Court in Texas. The Fed Circuit heard the case and sided with i4i.

Microsoft says that, aside from the money, it’s no real biggie:

“With respect to Microsoft Word 2007 and Microsoft Office 2007, we have been preparing for this possibility since the District Court issued its injunction in August 2009 and have put the wheels in motion to remove this little-used feature from these products. Therefore, we expect to have copies of Microsoft Word 2007 and Office 2007, with this feature removed, available for U.S. sale and distribution by the injunction date.  In addition, the beta versions of Microsoft Word 2010 and Microsoft Office 2010, which are available now for downloading, do not contain the technology covered by the injunction.”

Notice that first sentence, in which Microsoft calls the custom XML a “little-used feature.” Reading that, I immediately thought of Neal Stephenson’s book In The Beginning Was The Command Line — still fresh and relevant, even after 10 years — in which he calls MS Office an “omnibus software package” and compares it to Wal-Mart:

“As [graphical user interfaces] get more complex, and impose more and more overhead, this tendency becomes more pervasive, and the software packages grow ever more colossal; after a point they begin to merge with each other, as Microsoft Word and Excel and PowerPoint have merged into Microsoft Office: a stupendous software Wal-Mart sitting on the edge of a town filled with tiny shops that are all boarded up … The most serious drawback to the Wal-Mart approach is that most users only want or need a tiny fraction of what is contained in these giant software packages. The remainder is clutter, dead weight.”

What’s the app that I use most at work? Notepad. And at home? TextEdit on the Mac. Keep it simple.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 23, 2009 - 9:21 am

Music Law: How to Run Your Band's Business
By Richard Stim

Music Law can help you see your band as a business and turn it into a successful one.  Musician and attorney Richard Stim has filled this useful book with helpful advice on solving disputes between band members, dealing with lawyers, managers, and record companies, and even the increasingly important matter of sample clearance.  The book explains the business side of running a band from a legal perspective.  It covers downloads and other Internet issues, and more.


Library RecordBorrow itBuy itMore Titles

Submitted by: Malgorzata Pawska, Digital Content Coordinator
on December 21, 2009 - 12:00 am

Why, Oh Why?

“Blippy is a fun and easy way to see and discuss the things people are buying. Automatically share your favorite purchases from iTunes, Amazon, Zappos, Visa, MasterCard, and more.”

That is from the homepage of Blippy, which just launched as an invite-only beta service. My only comment/question is “Why?” Why would you willingly participate in something like this? This is simply a repackaged version of Facebook’s Beacon. And we all know how that turned out.

Enough with the self-absorption.

Link via TechCrunch.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 15, 2009 - 9:43 am

Aol’s First Day

The NY Times reports on Aol’s first day as a separate, public company. (Apparently the Times missed the press release that said AOL was rebranding itself as Aol. Sigh … One more reminder of the decline of professional journalism.) At the end of the day (literally), Aol was trading at 23.67 and valued at $2.55 billion.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 10, 2009 - 9:35 am

Fa-Lala-Lala-Lala-La-La: Apple Buys Music Streaming Service [UPDATED 3x]

Apple has acquired struggling (sinking?) online music streaming site Lala. Lala recently partnered with Google and Facebook, but according to Brad Stone of the NY Times, those deals apparently didn’t generate enough revenue to save the company, so it reached out to Apple:

“One person with knowledge of the deal, but who was not authorized to discuss it, said that the negotiations originated when Lala executives concluded that their prospects for turning a profit in the short term were dim and initiated discussions with Eddy Cue, Apple’s vice president in charge of iTunes.”

Apple jumped at the offer because it was a cheap way to get a head start on its own music streaming service:

“This person [see quote above] said Apple would primarily be buying Lala’s engineers, including its energetic co-founder Bill Nguyen, and their experience with cloud-based music services.”

Btw, Peter Kafka of MediaMemo says it was a fire sale:

“Lala’s investors will not get a return on the $35 million they’ve put into the company. Earlier this year, founder Bill Nguyen told me he was working on a deal to get the company more funding in an ‘up round’ -– that is, at a higher value than the previous round. But Warner Music Group, which had previously invested $20 million in Lala, wrote down $11 million of that. And a source tells me that the Apple transaction reflected a similar discount, meaning that investors will be lucky to get 50 cents on the dollar on this one.”

UPDATE #1, 4:00 pm – Kafka says the price was $80 million, so “some investors could get their money back and more.”

UPDATE #2, 12/8 – Michael Arrington of TechCrunch says the price was $17 million, and since Lala “supposedly had $14 million in cash in the bank, meaning the actual purchase price was really $3 million.”

TechCrunch wonders what effect the deal will have on Google’s music service and Facebook’s gift store, not to mention those people who actually paid money to stream music via Lala:

“This could be bad news for Lala users. It’s unlikely that the innovative deals negotiated by Lala will survive through the acquisition. For over a year, Lala users have been purchasing the rights to stream their music an unlimited number of times for ten cents per song. If the deals with the music labels go up in smoke, Lala may lose the right to stream those songs. In other words, all the money users have been spending on web songs may go down the drain. If the deals are nullified, hopefully Apple will renegotiate them to at least cover existing purchases until it releases its own streaming music service. We’ve reached out to Lala but have yet to hear back. Likewise, this may well affect the Lala music gifts that have been recently offered by Facebook, and it could also harm the Music OneBox service Google recently launched (though Google can still rely on MySpace/iLike for its song streams).”

Finally, Kafka points out that this is the third music deal in just about as many months. MySpace — desperately trying to reinvent themselves back into relevance — recently acquired iLike (late August) and Imeem (November).

UPDATE #3, 12/8 – TechCrunch says the Imeem deal has hit a snag, probably over who actually owns Imeem’s servers.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 07, 2009 - 10:28 am

It’s a Deal: Green Will Sell Navy to Crimson [UPDATED]

Today GE will announce that it has sold a 51% stake in NBC Universal to Comcast. According to the NY Times, the courtship was a secret for about 6 months, until details began leaking out in late September:

“The deal was a long time in the making and was filled with meetings at the Four Seasons hotel in Philadelphia, in New York City apartments and on helicopter rides. It also featured code names: G.E. was Green, NBC was Navy, Vivendi was Violet and Comcast was Crimson (because of the Harvard link).” [Note: GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt and Comcast COO Steve Burke were classmates at Harvard Business School.]

UPDATE, 12:30 pm – There are “no plans to alter Hulu’s free model“.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 03, 2009 - 8:41 am

AOL is now Aol. That’ll Help a Lot.

Their press release claims:

“The new AOL brand identity is a simple, confident logotype, revealed by ever changing images. It’s one consistent logo with countless ways to reveal.”

I’m sure that’ll be a comfort to the 2,500 sacrificial lambs.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on November 23, 2009 - 11:40 am

Microsoft Attacks. Google Responds With Zen.

Microsoft has offered to pay News Corp, owner of The Wall Street Journal, and other publishers to block their content from Google. This is an effort to make Google cough up cash for news content as well, thus reducing its profit margins. And it also fits nicely with Rupert Murdoch’s world-view, to boot.

Google is unperturbed. It knows that news stories, once posted, become available everywhere, even from Twitter. As the haiku error message says:

The Web site you seek
cannot be located but
endless others exist.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on November 23, 2009 - 9:51 am

Next Page »



  QUICK JUMP  
   
 SITE SEARCH 
 

advanced search
 
SEE ALSO:

Site Map
Need to find something specific? Use our Site Map to navigate your way.

 Jenkins News...
 Events Calendar...

   
Protected by Akismet & Powered by WordPress
This page was last updated 12-Aug-09 12:02:45 EDT
Copyright © 1996 - 2010, Jenkins Law Library. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Suggestions