| Good News: Jammie Thomas’ File-Sharing Verdict Is Reduced By 97% |
|
Bad news: it’s still more money than she can afford — $54,000. (But it’s better than $2 million.) Anyway, U.S. District Judge Michael Davis said in his ruling: “The need for deterrence cannot justify a $2 million verdict for stealing and illegally distributing 24 songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music. Moreover, although plaintiffs were not required to prove their actual damages, statutory damages must bear some relation to actual damages.” Thomas, always ready to provide us with a good soundbite — back in June she talked about squeezing blood from a turnip — said she appreciates the effort but still can’t pay: “It’s not like I have a money tree in the backyard.” Link via Wired. |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
December 29, 2009
| No Safe Harbor For BitTorrent Search Engine isoHunt |
|
Wired reports that Judge Stephen V. Wilson of the U.S. District Court for Central California ruled last week that BitTorrent search engine isoHunt, as well as other torrent sites operated by Gary Fung, violates copyright. (Rick, I’m shocked — shocked! — to find that gambling is going on in here!) Anyway, this is the next step in a story that began with Sweden’s crackdown on The Pirate Bay eight months ago. Judge Wilson has set up a status conference for January 11. We’ll see what happens then. |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
December 9, 2009
| Word of the Day: Zettabyte |
|
You may not know it, but you and 300 million or so of your closest friends consumed 3.6 of ‘em in 2008, according to a study by UC San Diego’s Global Information Industry Center. What this means is that 3.6 million million gigabytes of information flowed over us last year. The average ‘Mercan absorbed 34 gigs a day. Btw, this doesn’t even include work-related info usage: “Our statistics include information consumed in the home as well as outside the home for non-work-related reasons, including going to the movies, listening to the radio in the car, or talking on a cell phone. It does not include information consumed by individuals in the workplace.” I’m going home now. My eyeballs hurt. Link via NY Times. |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
December 7, 2009
| Fa-Lala-Lala-Lala-La-La: Apple Buys Music Streaming Service [UPDATED 3x] |
|
Apple has acquired struggling (sinking?) online music streaming site Lala. Lala recently partnered with Google and Facebook, but according to Brad Stone of the NY Times, those deals apparently didn’t generate enough revenue to save the company, so it reached out to Apple: “One person with knowledge of the deal, but who was not authorized to discuss it, said that the negotiations originated when Lala executives concluded that their prospects for turning a profit in the short term were dim and initiated discussions with Eddy Cue, Apple’s vice president in charge of iTunes.” Apple jumped at the offer because it was a cheap way to get a head start on its own music streaming service: “This person [see quote above] said Apple would primarily be buying Lala’s engineers, including its energetic co-founder Bill Nguyen, and their experience with cloud-based music services.” Btw, Peter Kafka of MediaMemo says it was a fire sale: “Lala’s investors will not get a return on the $35 million they’ve put into the company. Earlier this year, founder Bill Nguyen told me he was working on a deal to get the company more funding in an ‘up round’ -– that is, at a higher value than the previous round. But Warner Music Group, which had previously invested $20 million in Lala, wrote down $11 million of that. And a source tells me that the Apple transaction reflected a similar discount, meaning that investors will be lucky to get 50 cents on the dollar on this one.” UPDATE #1, 4:00 pm – Kafka says the price was $80 million, so “some investors could get their money back and more.” UPDATE #2, 12/8 – Michael Arrington of TechCrunch says the price was $17 million, and since Lala “supposedly had $14 million in cash in the bank, meaning the actual purchase price was really $3 million.” TechCrunch wonders what effect the deal will have on Google’s music service and Facebook’s gift store, not to mention those people who actually paid money to stream music via Lala: “This could be bad news for Lala users. It’s unlikely that the innovative deals negotiated by Lala will survive through the acquisition. For over a year, Lala users have been purchasing the rights to stream their music an unlimited number of times for ten cents per song. If the deals with the music labels go up in smoke, Lala may lose the right to stream those songs. In other words, all the money users have been spending on web songs may go down the drain. If the deals are nullified, hopefully Apple will renegotiate them to at least cover existing purchases until it releases its own streaming music service. We’ve reached out to Lala but have yet to hear back. Likewise, this may well affect the Lala music gifts that have been recently offered by Facebook, and it could also harm the Music OneBox service Google recently launched (though Google can still rely on MySpace/iLike for its song streams).” Finally, Kafka points out that this is the third music deal in just about as many months. MySpace — desperately trying to reinvent themselves back into relevance — recently acquired iLike (late August) and Imeem (November). UPDATE #3, 12/8 – TechCrunch says the Imeem deal has hit a snag, probably over who actually owns Imeem’s servers. |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
October 29, 2009
| Google Music Search Now Live (I Guess) |
|
The Google music search service I blogged about last week is now live. Except I’m not seeing it. I performed a controlled, highly-scientific search for “Ants Marching” and “Pride in the Name of Love” and got nada. Google said “We’ll be rolling this feature out gradually to users across the U.S. over the next day,” so I guess I should just relax. |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
October 23, 2009
| Google Will Launch a Music Service Next Wednesday, October 28 |
|
They’re partnering with Lala and MySpace’s iLike to make this happen. They won’t actually host the music, but you’ll be able to stream some tunes and purchase MP3s. TechCrunch claims to have some screencaps of a prototype version of the service. According to the NY Times, Facebook’s getting into the act, too. They’re going to integrate Lala into their store. So maybe instead of a cowbell, my daughter can actually send me something useful, like a complete song. One question: Does the world need another music service, let alone two? I don’t think so. |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
September 11, 2009
| Apple’s Music Event on Tuesday? In a Word, “Ho-Hum”. (Or Is That Two Words?) |
|
Recapping Apple’s music event on Tuesday, September 9:
I’m glad I just worked in my garden all day. |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
August 18, 2009
| Apple has 25% of the Music Market |
|
Apple’s iTunes Store accounts for 25% of all music sold in the ol’ U.S. of A, according to The NPD Group. They account for almost 70% of the digital music market, which is 35% of all music sold. Music CDs still make up 65% of all music sales — the addiction continues! — but, according to NPD, “with digital music sales growing at 15 to 20 percent, and CDs falling by an equal proportion, digital music sales will nearly equal CD sales by the end of 2010.” |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
August 11, 2009
| Is This An Example Of “Those Who Can’t, Teach?” |
|
The NY Times has an article about how Harvard Law School professor Charles Nesson bombed in the courtroom as defense counsel for Joel Tenenbaum, who admitted to illegally sharing 30 songs. The Times quotes Ben Sheffner, who’s a copyright lawyer and blogger, and who said: “… Professor Nesson’s breezy, almost insouciant manner was more suited to the classroom than the courtroom, where ‘there are hundreds of rules you have to follow, and if you don’t follow them, there is a judge who literally lays down the law.’” Sheffner has posted a comment on the Times’ article today: “I’d say we’re about :13:27 in to this story’s life. And when the clock strikes :15:00, Nesson goes back to his tenured position at Harvard Law School, his students can continue to talk about what ‘fun’ it was to ‘to test the limits of legal norms,’ and Tenenbaum will remain 25 years old, and $675,000 in debt.” |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|
August 4, 2009
| Well That Didn’t Take Long [UPDATED] |
|
Note: This was originally scheduled to be posted on Friday, July 31, but was delayed by hardware problems. The judge in the Joel Tenenbaum music file-sharing trial has ruled that Tenenbaum has admitted liability in the case. The jury will now decide whether he is guilty of willful infringement and decide on the penalty. Let’s do the math: 30 songs x $150,000 each = Good Golly Miss Molly. Jammie Thomas looks like she made out well by comparison. UPDATE, August 3: He got dinged $675,000. Could have been worse … |
|
|
Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
|







Comments (0)
RSS