Jenkins Law Library
 
Research
Catalog (JAC)
Court Records & Briefs
Journal Portal
Legal Links
Member Online Services
Nonlegal Links
PA Legislative Histories
Self-Help Links

Services
Ask a Librarian
CLE Classes
Wed @ Jenkins
Conference Rooms
Books for Sale
Lawyers in Transition
Library Orientation
Order Documents
Research Requests

Membership
Benefits
Join Now!
Member Directory

About Us
Contact Us
Mission & Vision
Site Map
Support Your Library

Blog
Home / Research Tools & Catalog / Research Guides / Jenkins Blog /

Archive for the 'Web 2.0' Category
Google Docs Will Now Take Anything You Throw At It

In a few weeks, you’ll be able to upload any type of file onto Google Docs:

“Instead of emailing files to yourself, which is particularly difficult with large files, you can upload to Google Docs any file up to 250 MB. You’ll have 1 GB of free storage for files you don’t convert into one of the Google Docs formats (i.e. Google documents, spreadsheets, and presentations), and if you need more space, you can buy additional storage for $0.25 per GB per year. This makes it easy to backup more of your key files online, from large graphics and raw photos to unedited home videos taken on your smartphone. You might even be able to replace the USB drive you reserved for those files that are too big to send over email.”

Those of you who read Douglas Rushkoff’s comments in my “Google Calls Out China” post will realize what a double-edged sword this really is.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on January 14, 2010 - 2:50 pm

Yo, Twitter! Get Your Password Act Together.

Last Friday visitors attempting to connect to Twitter were instead greeted by this page from the Iranian Cyber Army containing the Farsi equivalent of All your base are belong to us.

What happened? According to Computerworld, someone got ahold of the Twitter email address used to communicate with the company that managed Twitter’s Domain Name Servers. Once they controlled the account, they changed the DNS records for Twitter so that they connected to a different IP address, the one operated by the Iranian Cyber Army.

This is the second password oopsie for Twitter this year. You may remember back in the summer someone compromised a Twitter staffer’s email account and managed to abscond with a bunch of confidential company documents. Those docs eventually made it onto the Web.

Time to grow up, Twitter. Otherwise nobody’s going to take you seriously.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 21, 2009 - 2:47 pm

More On Facebook And Your Privacy

Last week Facebook enacted changes to the privacy controls on the site. Needless to say, they were not universally well-received:

“As an online marketer, I know that Facebook is a thriving, important venue. So I kind of have to keep an account. But I’m also giving up in some ways. This isn’t the place I’m planning to social network, because I just can’t expend the time to decide what I might be sharing, might not be sharing, what my friends might share, what friends of friends might share and then recheck all those settings every six months when Facebook does something different.”

Thank you, Danny, for that. It has instantly become my favorite Facebook sound bite.

To their credit and, as in the past, Facebook responded to some of the criticism. Now you can hide your friend list:

“In response to your feedback, we’ve improved the Friend List visibility option described below. Now when you uncheck the ‘Show my friends on my profile’ option in the Friends box on your profile, your Friend List won’t appear on your profile regardless of whether people are viewing it while logged into Facebook or logged out. This information is still publicly available, however, and can be accessed by applications.”

Got that? Good. But in case you want more advice, the NY Times has a how-to for the new Facebook privacy settings.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 15, 2009 - 12:00 pm

MapQuest Now Has Street-Level Images

Two weeks after Bing launched Streetside view, MapQuest now has 360 View, which, according to Search Engine Land, currently covers 30 cities plus 15 suburban areas. Here’s our building, sort-of. (They miss the mark by a half-block. Really gives you a sense of confidence in the service, don’t it?)

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 15, 2009 - 10:02 am

Why, Oh Why?

“Blippy is a fun and easy way to see and discuss the things people are buying. Automatically share your favorite purchases from iTunes, Amazon, Zappos, Visa, MasterCard, and more.”

That is from the homepage of Blippy, which just launched as an invite-only beta service. My only comment/question is “Why?” Why would you willingly participate in something like this? This is simply a repackaged version of Facebook’s Beacon. And we all know how that turned out.

Enough with the self-absorption.

Link via TechCrunch.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 15, 2009 - 9:43 am

Making Sense of the New Facebook Privacy Controls

As promised, Facebook implemented its new privacy controls yesterday. I know they’re supposed to be simpler, but imho they’re just as confusing. I still feel like I’m missing something. Oh, well …

Anyhoo, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has an excellent commentary on the changes:

“Being a free speech organization, EFF is supportive of internet users who consciously choose to share more on Facebook after weighing the privacy risks; more online speech is a good thing. But to ensure that users don’t accidentally share more than they intend to, we do not recommend Facebook’s ‘recommended’ settings. Facebook will justify the new push for more sharing with everyone by pointing to the new per-post privacy options — if you don’t want to share a particular piece of content with everyone, Facebook will argue, then just set the privacy level for that piece of content to something else. But we think the much safer option is to do the reverse: set your general privacy default to a more restrictive level, like ‘Only Friends,’ and then set the per-post privacy to ‘Everyone’ for those particular things that you’re sure you want to share with the world.”

I’m not comfortable with the new concept of “publicly available information” that Facebook says I cannot block. This bothers the EFF as well:

“The creation of this new category of “publicly available information” is made all the more ugly by Facebook’s failure to properly disclose it until today — the very day it is forcing the new change on users — when it added a new bullet point at the top of its privacy policy specifying this new category of public information that will not have any privacy settings. The previous versions of the policy, however, either didn’t disclose this fact at all, or buried it deep in the text surrounded by broad assurances of privacy.”

Here’s the bullet point to which the EFF refers:

“Certain categories of information such as your name, profile photo, list of friends and pages you are a fan of, gender, geographic region, and networks you belong to are considered publicly available to everyone, including Facebook-enhanced applications, and therefore do not have privacy settings. You can, however, limit the ability of others to find this information through search using your search privacy settings.”

I’ve never liked Facebook. I know Google collects just as much personal data from me — maybe more. At least with Google it’s a quid pro quo. They give me something I value — information — in return for my data. Facebook gives me nothing I care about — hey, if I want to know that you just came in from walking the dog, I’ll call you — in return for personal data that they’re soooo hot to monetize.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 10, 2009 - 2:07 pm

Aol’s First Day

The NY Times reports on Aol’s first day as a separate, public company. (Apparently the Times missed the press release that said AOL was rebranding itself as Aol. Sigh … One more reminder of the decline of professional journalism.) At the end of the day (literally), Aol was trading at 23.67 and valued at $2.55 billion.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 10, 2009 - 9:35 am

Word of the Day: Zettabyte

You may not know it, but you and 300 million or so of your closest friends consumed 3.6 of ‘em in 2008, according to a study by UC San Diego’s Global Information Industry Center. What this means is that 3.6 million million gigabytes of information flowed over us last year. The average ‘Mercan absorbed 34 gigs a day. Btw, this doesn’t even include work-related info usage:

“Our statistics include information consumed in the home as well as outside the home for non-work-related reasons, including going to the movies, listening to the radio in the car, or talking on a cell phone. It does not include information consumed by individuals in the workplace.”

I’m going home now. My eyeballs hurt.

Link via NY Times.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 09, 2009 - 4:31 pm

Google Real-Time Search

Yesterday Google announced real-time search. Your results page will now contain Tweets, plus posts from sites such as FriendFeed, Jaiku, Identi.ca and (real soon now) updates from public MySpace and Facebook pages.

Here’s an example I stumbled onto today. Apparently Bryant Gumbel revealed on the Regis & Kelly show this morning that he recently had surgery for lung cancer. My search results for bryant gumbel cancer features a constantly-updating stream of Tweets near the top of the page.

If I want to view only the real-time results, I can click on Show Options in the blue stripe at the top of the results page, then click on the Latest link. This will also include stories from other sources that have just been indexed. (In my case, I see Star Magazine and the BBC, among others.)

Real-time search is being rolled-out gradually, so if you can’t see it now, you will soon.

One more thing: Google Trends, which has now graduated from Google Labs, now shows you trending topics, similar, but not identical to, Twitter’s. (That’s how I found out about Mr. Gumbel’s condition.) Last week the WSJ Digit’s blog had an interesting story about the differences between trending topics on Bing Twitter and Twitter itself.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 08, 2009 - 1:59 pm

Fa-Lala-Lala-Lala-La-La: Apple Buys Music Streaming Service [UPDATED 3x]

Apple has acquired struggling (sinking?) online music streaming site Lala. Lala recently partnered with Google and Facebook, but according to Brad Stone of the NY Times, those deals apparently didn’t generate enough revenue to save the company, so it reached out to Apple:

“One person with knowledge of the deal, but who was not authorized to discuss it, said that the negotiations originated when Lala executives concluded that their prospects for turning a profit in the short term were dim and initiated discussions with Eddy Cue, Apple’s vice president in charge of iTunes.”

Apple jumped at the offer because it was a cheap way to get a head start on its own music streaming service:

“This person [see quote above] said Apple would primarily be buying Lala’s engineers, including its energetic co-founder Bill Nguyen, and their experience with cloud-based music services.”

Btw, Peter Kafka of MediaMemo says it was a fire sale:

“Lala’s investors will not get a return on the $35 million they’ve put into the company. Earlier this year, founder Bill Nguyen told me he was working on a deal to get the company more funding in an ‘up round’ -– that is, at a higher value than the previous round. But Warner Music Group, which had previously invested $20 million in Lala, wrote down $11 million of that. And a source tells me that the Apple transaction reflected a similar discount, meaning that investors will be lucky to get 50 cents on the dollar on this one.”

UPDATE #1, 4:00 pm – Kafka says the price was $80 million, so “some investors could get their money back and more.”

UPDATE #2, 12/8 – Michael Arrington of TechCrunch says the price was $17 million, and since Lala “supposedly had $14 million in cash in the bank, meaning the actual purchase price was really $3 million.”

TechCrunch wonders what effect the deal will have on Google’s music service and Facebook’s gift store, not to mention those people who actually paid money to stream music via Lala:

“This could be bad news for Lala users. It’s unlikely that the innovative deals negotiated by Lala will survive through the acquisition. For over a year, Lala users have been purchasing the rights to stream their music an unlimited number of times for ten cents per song. If the deals with the music labels go up in smoke, Lala may lose the right to stream those songs. In other words, all the money users have been spending on web songs may go down the drain. If the deals are nullified, hopefully Apple will renegotiate them to at least cover existing purchases until it releases its own streaming music service. We’ve reached out to Lala but have yet to hear back. Likewise, this may well affect the Lala music gifts that have been recently offered by Facebook, and it could also harm the Music OneBox service Google recently launched (though Google can still rely on MySpace/iLike for its song streams).”

Finally, Kafka points out that this is the third music deal in just about as many months. MySpace — desperately trying to reinvent themselves back into relevance — recently acquired iLike (late August) and Imeem (November).

UPDATE #3, 12/8 – TechCrunch says the Imeem deal has hit a snag, probably over who actually owns Imeem’s servers.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on December 07, 2009 - 10:28 am

Next Page »



  QUICK JUMP  
   
 SITE SEARCH 
 

advanced search
 
SEE ALSO:

Site Map
Need to find something specific? Use our Site Map to navigate your way.

 Jenkins News...
 Events Calendar...

   
Protected by Akismet & Powered by WordPress
This page was last updated 12-Aug-09 12:02:45 EDT
Copyright © 1996 - 2010, Jenkins Law Library. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Suggestions