Bad news: it’s still more money than she can afford — $54,000. (But it’s better than $2 million.)

Anyway, U.S. District Judge Michael Davis said in his ruling:

“The need for deterrence cannot justify a $2 million verdict for stealing and illegally distributing 24 songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music. Moreover, although plaintiffs were not required to prove their actual damages, statutory damages must bear some relation to actual damages.”

Thomas, always ready to provide us with a good soundbite — back in June she talked about squeezing blood from a turnip — said she appreciates the effort but still can’t pay:

“It’s not like I have a money tree in the backyard.”

Link via Wired.

Submitted by: Dan Giancaterino, Education Services Manager
on January 26, 2010 - 2:30 pm

Comments (0) | More Federal, Internet, Law, Music, Technology Posts