translate
Blog

SCOTUS Rules "No One Can Own The Law" - Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.

The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 opinion on April 27, 2020 in the case Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. The case considered whether annotations that summarize and provide further context to the law are copyrightable, particularly when the annotated version of the law is the official code. The decision ruled in favor of Public.Resource.Org which argued that copyright protections do not extend to the Official Code of Georgia Annotated.

In the majority opinion, Chief Justice Roberts held that the "government edicts doctrine," the doctrine that precludes copyright protection of judicial opinions and statutes, also applies to the annotations prepared and adopted by the legislature. Roberts stated, “If judges, acting as judges, cannot be “authors” because of their authority to make and interpret the law, it follows that legislators, acting as legislators, cannot be either” (p.8).

Two dissenting opinions were filed. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Alito and Justice Breyer, and Justice Ginsburg's opinion was joined by Justice Breyer. Both dissenting opinions concluded that the annotations fall outside of the scope of the government edicts doctrine. In his dissent, Justice Thomas wrote, "This ruling will likely come as a shock to the 25 other jurisdictions—22 States, 2 Territories,  and  the District of Columbia—that rely on arrangements similar to Georgia’s to produce annotated codes" (p.1). In Pennsylvania, the annotated version of the statutes is unofficial, therefore it is not included in the 22 states mentioned. For more information on the organization of Pennsylvania's statutes, see our PA Statutes research guide.

Several library associations including the American Association of Law Libraries filed an amicus brief in support of Public.Resource.Org, Inc. The associations explained to the court "how libraries rely on the government edicts doctrine to provide access to, and preserve, official legal materials" (p.1).

More from the blog

LLMC Digital is a collection of archival material from the U.S. federal government, U.S. state governments, territorial governments, various Anglo-American collections, and several foreign jurisdictions. Its U.S. state materials includes various Pennsylvania county reporters, many of which begin...
In Pennsylvania, there are only a select number of Court of Common Pleas opinions that get published each year. While there is no one place to search all county cases, Jenkins members have access to three databases that include Pennsylvania county case content. If you're a member, make sure you're...
Jenkins recently updated its Philadelphia City Solicitor Opinions database with additional opinions, expanding coverage through 2019. The Philadelphia City Solicitor Opinions database contains exclusive coverage of over 2,300 full-text, searchable opinions issued by the Philadelphia City Solicitor...